Masatoshi Kimura
2007-01-30 17:12:36 UTC
The appendix 5 of JIS X 0213 allow to use alternate character name
for some code points.
However, RFC 2978 mandates an unique mapping.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2978.txt
What do you think about this ambiguity? Please clarify your choice
on the proposed registration.
for some code points.
However, RFC 2978 mandates an unique mapping.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2978.txt
However, the definition associated with a
charset name must fully specify the mapping to be performed. In
particular, use of external profiling information to determine the
exact mapping is not permitted.
So you will have to choose only one mapping.charset name must fully specify the mapping to be performed. In
particular, use of external profiling information to determine the
exact mapping is not permitted.
What do you think about this ambiguity? Please clarify your choice
on the proposed registration.
--
***@nifty.ne.jp
***@nifty.ne.jp